
You have no homework over academic travel. It would be ideal if you reviewed your photosynthesis notes before coming to class on Monday.
“Education, therefore, is a process of living and not a preparation for future living.” ~ John Dewey
Below is a table of raw data from all three classes for the Potato Catalase Lab. Note: all units are in cm. Be sure to include units in your answers for all the questions.
| sample | Hot | Room Temp | Cold |
| 1 | 0.1 | 5.8 | 3.4 |
| 2 | 0 | 4.7 | 5.3 |
| 3 | 0.1 | 5 | 6 |
| 4 | 4 | 8 | 6.8 |
| 5 | 0.1 | 3.9 | 5.9 |
| 6 | 0 | 2.8 | 4.2 |
| 7 | 0 | 4.5 | 8 |
| 8 | 0 | 5 | 4.8 |
| 9 | 0.2 | 4.5 | 5.5 |
| 10 | 0.1 | 3.5 | 5 |
| 11 | 0.2 | 4 | 1.5 |
| 12 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
2. What is raw data?
3. True or False: you should include raw data in your discussion section of your lab reports? (circle one answer).
4. What is the average height of the bubbles for the hot group _______________?
5. What is the average height of the bubbles for the room temperature group _____________?
6. What is the average height of the bubbles for the cold group ______________?
7. What do you suppose could be an explanation for the anomaly in sample 4?
8. What biological concept did this lab illustrate? Write your answer in at least three complete sentences.
Today students examined the effect of temperature on potato catalase, which is an enzyme. Using hydrogen peroxide which reacts with catalase to create bubbles, students were able to see that when catalase is denatured by a heat source, no bubbles are formed.Here, the researcher interprets the data in terms of any patterns that were observed, any relationships among experimental variables that are important and any correlations between variables that are discernible. The author should include any explanations of how the results differed from those hypothesized, or how the results were either different from or similar to those of any related experiments performed by other researchers. Remember that experiments do not always need to show major differences or trends to be important. "Negative" results also need to be explained and may represent something important--perhaps a new or changed focus for your research.
A useful strategy in discussing your experiment is to relate your specific results back to the broad theoretical context presented in the Introduction. Since your Introduction went from the general to a specific question, going from the specific back to the general will help to tie your ideas and arguments together.
Remember that your discussion should have a title that follows the guidelines we talked about in class. I don't want to read anything titled "Salty Pea Lab."